[Devel] Re: Namespaces exhausted CLONE_XXX bits problem
Serge E. Hallyn
serue at us.ibm.com
Mon Jan 14 08:32:46 PST 2008
Quoting Cedric Le Goater (clg at fr.ibm.com):
> to be more precise :
>
> long sys_clone_something(struct clone_something_args args)
>
> and
>
> long sys_unshare_something(struct unshare_something_args args)
>
> The arg passing will be slower bc of the copy_from_user() but we will
> still have the sys_clone syscall for the fast path.
>
> C.
I'm fine with the direction you're going, but just as one more option,
we could follow more of the selinux/lsm approach of first requesting
clone/unshare options, then doing the actual clone/unshare. So
something like
sys_clone_request(extended_64bit_clone_flags)
sys_clone(usual args)
or
echo pid,mqueue,user,ipc,uts,net > /proc/self/clone_unshare
clone()
-serge
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list