[Devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/4] checkpoint-restart: general infrastructure
Jonathan Corbet
corbet at lwn.net
Mon Aug 11 11:03:15 PDT 2008
I'm trying to figure out this patch set...here's a few things which
have caught my eye in passing.
> +/**
> + * cr_get_fname - return pathname of a given file
> + * @file: file pointer
> + * @buf: buffer for pathname
> + * @n: buffer length (in) and pathname length (out)
> + *
> + * if the buffer provivded by the caller is too small, allocate a new
> + * buffer; caller should call cr_put_pathname() for cleanup
> + */
> +char *cr_get_fname(struct path *path, struct path *root, char *buf,
> int *n) +{
> + char *fname;
> +
> + fname = __d_path(path, root, buf, *n);
> +
> + if (IS_ERR(fname) && PTR_ERR(fname) == -ENAMETOOLONG) {
> + if (!(buf = (char *) __get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL, 0)))
This seems like a clunky and error-prone interface - why not just have it
allocate the memory always? But, in this case, cr_get_fname() always seems
to be called with ctx->tbuf, which, in turn, is an order-1 allocation.
Here you're saying that if it's too small, you'll try replacing it with an
order-0 allocation instead. I rather suspect that's not going to help.
> +/* write the checkpoint header */
> +static int cr_write_hdr(struct cr_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> + struct cr_hdr h;
> + struct cr_hdr_head *hh = ctx->tbuf;
> + struct timeval ktv;
> +
> + h.type = CR_HDR_HEAD;
> + h.len = sizeof(*hh);
> + h.id = 0;
> +
> + do_gettimeofday(&ktv);
> +
> + hh->magic = 0x00a2d200;
This magic number is hard-coded in a number of places. Could it maybe
benefit from a macro, which, in turn, could maybe end up in linux/magic.h?
> +/* dump the task_struct of a given task */
> +static int cr_write_task_struct(struct cr_ctx *ctx, struct task_struct *t)
This function is going to break every time somebody changes struct
task_struct. I'm not quite sure how to prevent that. I wonder if the
modversions stuff could somehow be employed to detect changes and make the
build fail?
> +/**
> + * sys_checkpoint - checkpoint a container
> + * @pid: pid of the container init(1) process
> + * @fd: file to which dump the checkpoint image
> + * @flags: checkpoint operation flags
> + */
> +asmlinkage long sys_checkpoint(pid_t pid, int fd, unsigned long
> flags) +{
> + struct cr_ctx *ctx;
> + struct file *file;
> + int fput_needed;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> + return -EPERM;
Like others, I wondered why CAP_SYS_ADMIN was required here. I *still*
wonder, though, how you'll ever be able to do restart without a privilege
check. There must be a thousand ways to compromise a system by messing
with the checkpoint file.
> + file = fget_light(fd, &fput_needed);
> + if (!file)
> + return -EBADF;
Should you maybe check for write access? An attempt to overwrite a
read-only file won't succeed, but you could save a lot of work by just
failing it with a clear code here.
What about the file position? Perhaps there could be a good reason to
checkpoint a process into the middle of a file, don't know.
In general, I don't see a whole lot of locking going on. Is it really
possible to save and restore memory without ever holding mmap_sem?
jon
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list