[Devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/5] Add a Signal Control Group Subsystem
Matt Helsley
matthltc at us.ibm.com
Wed Apr 30 00:48:34 PDT 2008
On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 14:30 -0500, Paul Jackson wrote:
> > +static struct cftype kill_file = {
> > + .name = "kill",
>
> The name "kill" seems ambiguous to me. It suggests that any write
> will send some default signal (TERM or KILL?) to all tasks in the
> cgroup, rather like the 'killall' command.
>
> I'm guessing that more people, on seeing this file in a cgroup
> directory, will guess correctly what it does if it were named
> "signal" or "send_signal" or some such.
OK, I renamed it signal.send and replaced all uses of "kill" in the code
to indicate that we're actually sending a signal -- not "KILL"ing
things :).
Cheers,
-Matt
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list