[Devel] Re: [PATCH 1/3] change clone_flags type to u64

[Cedric Le Goater]

Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> The was no real rationale except for some people seeing "clone" functionality
> as the match and the fact that FS_NAMESCAPE was done so made them believe it 
> is a good way to go.
> And I warned about flags limitation at the beginning.

yes and now, we've hit the clone wall but that's a good thing.

> Both OpenVZ/vserver suggested to use a special syscall for handling this.

most projects do it that way.

> Maybe it is a good point to switch to it now finally and stop worring about all 
> this?

what would be the interface ? 

C. 

 
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers