[Devel] Re: [PATCH 3/3] add the clone64() and unshare64() syscalls
sukadev at us.ibm.com
sukadev at us.ibm.com
Wed Apr 9 19:15:23 PDT 2008
Jakub Jelinek [jakub at redhat.com] wrote:
| On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 03:34:59PM -0700, sukadev at us.ibm.com wrote:
| > From: Cedric Le Goater <clg at fr.ibm.com>
| > Subject: [PATCH 3/3] add the clone64() and unshare64() syscalls
| >
| > This patch adds 2 new syscalls :
| >
| > long sys_clone64(unsigned long flags_high, unsigned long flags_low,
| > unsigned long newsp);
| >
| > long sys_unshare64(unsigned long flags_high, unsigned long flags_low);
|
| Can you explain why are you adding it for 64-bit arches too? unsigned long
| is there already 64-bit, and both sys_clone and sys_unshare have unsigned
| long flags, rather than unsigned int.
Hmm,
By simply resuing clone() on 64 bit and adding a new call for 32-bit won't
the semantics of clone() differ between the two ?
i.e clone() on 64 bit supports say CLONE_NEWPTS clone() on 32bit does not ?
Wouldn't it be simpler/cleaner if clone() and clone64() behaved the same
on both 32 and 64 bit systems ?
Sukadev
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list