[Devel] Re: [PATCH -mm 2/3] cgroup: simplify init_subsys()
Li Zefan
lizf at cn.fujitsu.com
Wed Apr 2 21:59:34 PDT 2008
Paul Menage wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Li Zefan <lizf at cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> -
>> - /* If this subsystem requested that it be notified with fork
>> - * events, we should send it one now for every process in the
>> - * system */
>> - if (ss->fork) {
>> - struct task_struct *g, *p;
>> -
>> - read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
>> - do_each_thread(g, p) {
>> - ss->fork(ss, p);
>> - } while_each_thread(g, p);
>> - read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
>> - }
>
> Should we maybe call ss->fork(ss, &init_task) ? Or just document that
> ss->fork() explicitly doesn't get called for init.
>
> Maybe also add some BUG()s to confirm that no other tasks have in fact
> been forked by this point?
>
At system boot, before all the subsystems have been registered, no processes
including init has been forked, am I right? So the fork callback will be
invoked when the init process is forked, so we don't need to call
ss->fork(ss, &init_task).
I'll add a BUG_ON(), and update the document about the fork callback.
Regards,
Li Zefan
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list