[Devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH] allow "unlimited" limit value.

[Paul Menage]

On 9/25/07, Balbir Singh <balbir at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> nit pick, should be memory.limit_in_bytes
>

Can we reconsider this? I do think that plain "limit" would enable you
to have a more consistent API across all resource counters users.

I realise that there's the issue that if someone's never heard of the
memory controller and never read any docs for it then they might  be
very briefly uncertain as to the units, but really, that's what
documentation is for.

Paul
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers