[Devel] Re: pid namespace .text overhead

[Dave Hansen]

On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 19:04 -0700, sukadev at us.ibm.com wrote:
> 
> Thats a good point.
> 
> We have been a bit liberal with "inline" given that lot of the code
> was
> going to affect the "fast-path" clone().
> 
> Should we shoot for a time/space trade-off or can we make some inlines
> conditional (i.e inline when not configured for say embedded linux) ? 

Can we make them switch somehow on -Os?  That's what the embedded guys
use.

-- Dave

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers