[Devel] Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure

[Dmitry Adamushko]

On 11/09/2007, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> [ ... ]

I guess, 'rq->curr == tsk' implies a task was on the 'rq' (before
dequeueing) in this particular case. What's about a minor optimization
like below (plus, let's make use of task_running()):

[ btw., real-time task can be also added to a container, right? I
guess, it can be used at least for group-aware load-balancing of
rt_tasks... otherwise, I guess, cpu-resource controlling is not that
applicable to, say, SCHED_FIFO :-)
Anyway, to this goal rt_task should become aware of group-related bits
of the 'struct sched_entity'... and at the moment, the code below is
effectively just a 'nop' for them.. right? ]

/* change task's runqueue when it moves between groups */
static void sched_move_task(struct container_subsys *ss, struct container *cont,
                      struct container *old_cont, struct task_struct *tsk)
{
       int on_rq, running;
       unsigned long flags;
       struct rq *rq;

       rq = task_rq_lock(tsk, &flags);
       update_rq_clock(rq);

       running = task_running(rq, tsk);
       on_rq = tsk->se.on_rq;
       if (on_rq) {
               dequeue_task(rq, tsk, 0);

               if (unlikely(running) && tsk->sched_class == &fair_sched_class)
                      tsk->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, tsk);
       }

       set_task_cfs_rq(tsk);

       if (on_rq) {
                enqueue_task(rq, tsk, 0);

                if (unlikely(running) && tsk->sched_class == &fair_sched_class)
                       tsk->sched_class->set_curr_task(rq);
       }

       task_rq_unlock(rq, &flags);
}


> --
> Regards,
> vatsa
>

-- 
Best regards,
Dmitry Adamushko
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers