[Devel] Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure

[Andrew Morton]

On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 22:53:34 +0530 Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 07:05:00PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > On Sep 10 2007 22:40, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> > >+#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
> > >+SUBSYS(cpuctlr)
> > >+#endif
> > 
> > cpuctl, cpuctrl, cpu_controller?
> 
> *shrug* .. I used "cpuctlr" to mean "CPU Controller". Any other short names
> would do. From your list, cpuctl or cpuctrl both qualifies IMO!
> 
> Unless folks have strong objection to it, I prefer "cptctlr", the way it is.
> 

objection ;)  "cpuctlr" isn't memorable.  Kernel code is write-rarely,
read-often.  "cpu_controller", please.  The extra typing is worth it ;)
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers