[Devel] [PATCH] pidns: Place under CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL (take 2)

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge]

Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Roughly that sounds like CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL to me.  But I would
> be happy to hear if someone has a better idea.
>   

Rather than overload an existing config option, why not add one with the
specific semantics you want: CONFIG_UNSTABLE_UABI.  The problem seems
like one which which may occur again, though one hopes not too often.  I
guess the risk is that people will leave their subsystems depending on
it permanently (sysfs?), so it ends up being set all the time and
becomes as useless as EXPERIMENTAL...

    J
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers