[Devel] Re: [NETNS] Oops in register_pernet_operations() with CONFIG_NET_NS=n

[Denis V. Lunev]

The patch attached should help. The idea is simple. The "init" should be
called only once without NETNS. Period. No need for any lists.

I'll resend it to Dave after the ACK.

Regards,
	Den

Benjamin Thery wrote:
> Hello Pavel,
> 
> I've found a problem with one of your patch related to netns:
> 
> * [NETNS] Move some code into __init section when CONFIG_NET_NS=n (v2)
>    http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg43310.html
> 
> This patch introduces the __net_init/__net_exit/__net_initdata
> defines to save some memory when CONFIG_NET_NS is not set.
> 
> Cedric Le Goater reported he had a *non-fatal* oops when booting
> a 2.6.23-mm1-lxc1 kernel with CONFIG_NET_NS=n. (2.6.23-mm1-lxc1 
> contains the NETNS49 patchset). The oops occured when modules 
> related to iptables were loaded after the boot completes.
> 
> The problem is the following:
> 
> - Your patch adds the __net_initdata attribute to pernet_operations 
>   structures.
> 
> - pernet_operations are registered via register_pernet_subsys() and 
>   linked in the pernet_list during boot.
> 
> - At the end of boot, pernet_operations are freed (because of the
>   __net_initdata attribute), and the pernet_list (or first_device list) 
>   points to freed memory.
> 
> - After boot, network modules which are netns-aware try to register
>   themselves with register_pernet_subsys() and ...KABOOM... page
>   fault when accessing pernet_list (or first_device list).
>   (I reproduce Cedric's oops with the command: iptables --list)
> 
> This is not a problem right now in 2.6.23-mm1 or net-2.6 because 
> there are very few netns-aware network subsystems merged and they
> are all initialized during boot. But it will be problematic when 
> we will merge netns code for subsystems which can be built as 
> modules (eg. iptables, ...). I'm not sure we can use 
> __net_init_data for pernet_operations then. 
> Maybe we can add some checks in register_pernet_operations
> when CONFIG_NET_NS=n.
> 
> I haven't found a fix yet.
> 
> Regards,
> Benjamin
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: diff-no-netns
URL: <http://lists.openvz.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20071025/9b182d80/attachment-0001.ksh>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers