[Devel] [RFC][PATCH] memory cgroup enhancements updated [1/10] try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages bugfix

[KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki]

Because NODE_DATA(node)->node_zonelists[] is guaranteed to contain
all necessary zones, it is not necessary to use for_each_online_node.

And this for_each_online_node() makes reclaim routine start always
from node 0. This is bad.

Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu at jp.fujitsu.com>



 mm/vmscan.c |    8 +++-----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Index: devel-2.6.23-mm1/mm/vmscan.c
===================================================================
--- devel-2.6.23-mm1.orig/mm/vmscan.c
+++ devel-2.6.23-mm1/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1375,15 +1375,13 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pag
 		.mem_cgroup = mem_cont,
 		.isolate_pages = mem_cgroup_isolate_pages,
 	};
-	int node;
+	int node = numa_node_id();
 	struct zone **zones;
 	int target_zone = gfp_zone(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE);
 
-	for_each_online_node(node) {
-		zones = NODE_DATA(node)->node_zonelists[target_zone].zones;
-		if (do_try_to_free_pages(zones, sc.gfp_mask, &sc))
+	zones = NODE_DATA(node)->node_zonelists[target_zone].zones;
+	if (do_try_to_free_pages(zones, sc.gfp_mask, &sc))
 			return 1;
-	}
 	return 0;
 }
 #endif

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers