[Devel] Re: [PATCH 1/3] Introduce the dummy_pid

Randy Dunlap randy.dunlap at oracle.com
Wed Oct 3 11:06:10 PDT 2007


On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 18:19:01 +0400 Pavel Emelyanov wrote:

> This is a pid which is attached to tasks when they detach
> their pids. This is done in detach_pid() and transfer_pid().
> The pid_alive() check is changed to reflect this fact.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul at openvz.org>
> 
> ---
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 4f21af1..e17b8f8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1286,9 +1286,11 @@ static inline pid_t task_ppid_nr_ns(stru
>   * If pid_alive fails, then pointers within the task structure
>   * can be stale and must not be dereferenced.
>   */
> +extern struct pid dummy_pid;
> +
>  static inline int pid_alive(struct task_struct *p)
>  {
> -	return p->pids[PIDTYPE_PID].pid != NULL;
> +	return p->pids[PIDTYPE_PID].pid != &dummy_pid;
>  }
>  
>  /**
> diff --git a/kernel/pid.c b/kernel/pid.c
> index d7388d7..b7a11cf 100644
> --- a/kernel/pid.c
> +++ b/kernel/pid.c
> @@ -81,6 +81,17 @@ struct pid_namespace init_pid_ns = {
>  };
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(init_pid_ns);
>  
> +struct pid dummy_pid = {
> +	.count 		= ATOMIC_INIT(1),
> +	.numbers	= { {
> +		.nr		= 0,		/* this is what pid_nr will return
> +						 * for tasks with no pids
> +						 */
> +		.ns		= &init_pid_ns,
> +	}, }
> +};
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dummy_pid);

Why is the EXPORT_SYMBOL() needed?
IOW, is some loadable module going to use this?

---
~Randy




More information about the Devel mailing list