[Devel] Re: [RFC][ only for review ] memory controller bacground reclaim [4/5] high/low watermark for memory controller

[Pavel Emelyanov]

KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> High Low watermark for page reclaiming in memory cgroup(1)
> 
> High-Low value here is implemented for support background reclaim.
> 
>  - If USAGE is bigger than high watermark, background reclaim starts.
>  - If USAGE is lower than low watermark, background reclaim stops.
> 
> Each value is represented in bytes.
> (Not configurable now, but can be easily.)
> The routine which reclaim is in the next patch. This patch just adds
> high/low watermark value.
> 
> Changes from YAMAMOTO-san's version
>   - I like automatic adjustment of high/low watermark.
>     So, I added a code to modify high/low watermark every time the limit
>     changes. A user can custorimize it by hand later.
>     (I think 93%/97% is not so bad value. need investigation.)
> 
> TODO:
>  - update documentation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu at jp.fujitsu.com>
> 
>  mm/memcontrol.c |   63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6.24-rc3-mm1/mm/memcontrol.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.24-rc3-mm1.orig/mm/memcontrol.c	2007-11-28 16:30:44.000000000 +0900
> +++ linux-2.6.24-rc3-mm1/mm/memcontrol.c	2007-11-28 16:44:57.000000000 +0900
> @@ -108,16 +108,12 @@
>  	struct mem_cgroup_per_node *nodeinfo[MAX_NUMNODES];
>  };
>  
> +
>  /*
>   * The memory controller data structure. The memory controller controls both
>   * page cache and RSS per cgroup. We would eventually like to provide
>   * statistics based on the statistics developed by Rik Van Riel for clock-pro,
>   * to help the administrator determine what knobs to tune.
> - *
> - * TODO: Add a water mark for the memory controller. Reclaim will begin when
> - * we hit the water mark. May be even add a low water mark, such that
> - * no reclaim occurs from a cgroup at it's low water mark, this is
> - * a feature that will be implemented much later in the future.
>   */
>  struct mem_cgroup {
>  	struct cgroup_subsys_state css;
> @@ -162,6 +158,15 @@
>  #define PAGE_CGROUP_FLAG_CACHE	(0x1)	/* charged as cache */
>  #define PAGE_CGROUP_FLAG_ACTIVE (0x2)	/* page is active in this cgroup */
>  
> +/*
> + * Default value for high-low watermark for start/stop background reclaim.
> + * represented in percent here. can be customized by user later.
> + * This is applied always limit change.
> + */
> +#define DEFAULT_WATERMARK_PERCENT_LOW	(93ULL)
> +#define DEFAULT_WATERMARK_PERCENT_HIGH	(97ULL)
> +
> +
>  static inline int page_cgroup_nid(struct page_cgroup *pc)
>  {
>  	return page_to_nid(pc->page);
> @@ -926,6 +931,29 @@
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static void mem_cgroup_init_watermark(struct cgroup *cont)
> +{
> +	struct mem_cgroup *mem;
> +	unsigned long long val, high, low;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	mem = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cont);
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&mem->res.lock, flags);
> +	val = res_counter_get(&mem->res, RES_LIMIT);
> +	if (val == (unsigned long long) LLONG_MAX) {
> +		low = (unsigned long long) LLONG_MAX;
> +		high = (unsigned long long) LLONG_MAX;
> +	} else {
> +		low = val * DEFAULT_WATERMARK_PERCENT_LOW / 100ULL;
> +		high = val * DEFAULT_WATERMARK_PERCENT_HIGH / 100ULL;

BTW, I tried to compile such a code:

unsigned long long x, y;
y = ...;
x = y / 100ULL;

(similar to yours) and that's what I got:

kernel/built-in.o: In function `xxx':
: undefined reference to `__udivdi3'

It looks like i386 doesn't have any support for ULL divisions.
It doesn't have it in CPU, and I thought that it was some-how 
emulated, but it is not...

Did I miss something?

> +	}
> +	res_counter_set(&mem->res, RES_LOW_WATERMARK, low);
> +	res_counter_set(&mem->res, RES_HIGH_WATERMARK, high);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mem->res.lock, flags);
> +	return;
> +}
> +
> +
>  static ssize_t mem_cgroup_read(struct cgroup *cont,
>  			struct cftype *cft, struct file *file,
>  			char __user *userbuf, size_t nbytes, loff_t *ppos)
> @@ -944,6 +972,17 @@
>  				mem_cgroup_write_strategy);
>  }
>  
> +static ssize_t mem_cgroup_write_limit(struct cgroup *cont, struct cftype *cft,
> +				struct file *file, const char __user *userbuf,
> +				size_t nbytes, loff_t *ppos)
> +{
> +	ssize_t ret;
> +	ret = mem_cgroup_write(cont, cft, file, userbuf, nbytes, ppos);
> +	if (ret > 0)
> +		mem_cgroup_init_watermark(cont);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  static ssize_t mem_control_type_write(struct cgroup *cont,
>  			struct cftype *cft, struct file *file,
>  			const char __user *userbuf,
> @@ -1088,7 +1127,7 @@
>  	{
>  		.name = "limit_in_bytes",
>  		.private = RES_LIMIT,
> -		.write = mem_cgroup_write,
> +		.write = mem_cgroup_write_limit,
>  		.read = mem_cgroup_read,
>  	},
>  	{
> @@ -1102,6 +1141,18 @@
>  		.read = mem_control_type_read,
>  	},
>  	{
> +		.name = "low_watermark_in_bytes",
> +		.private = RES_LOW_WATERMARK,
> +		.write = mem_cgroup_write,
> +		.read = mem_cgroup_read,
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.name = "high_watermark_in_bytes",
> +		.private = RES_HIGH_WATERMARK,
> +		.write = mem_cgroup_write,
> +		.read = mem_cgroup_read,
> +	},
> +	{
>  		.name = "force_empty",
>  		.write = mem_force_empty_write,
>  		.read = mem_force_empty_read,
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers