[Devel] Re: [RFC][ only for review ] memory controller bacground reclaim [3/5] high/low watermark support in res_counter

[Pavel Emelyanov]

KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> This patch adds high/low watermark parameter to res_counter.
> splitted out from YAMAMOTO's background page reclaim for memory cgroup set.
> 
> Changes:
>  * added param watermark_state this allows status check without lock.
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu at jp.fujitsu.com>
> From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto at valinux.co.jp>
> 
>  include/linux/res_counter.h |   27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  kernel/res_counter.c        |   46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6.24-rc3-mm1/include/linux/res_counter.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.24-rc3-mm1.orig/include/linux/res_counter.h	2007-11-28 14:33:19.000000000 +0900
> +++ linux-2.6.24-rc3-mm1/include/linux/res_counter.h	2007-11-28 16:37:32.000000000 +0900
> @@ -19,6 +19,12 @@
>   * the helpers described beyond
>   */
>  
> +enum watermark_state {
> +	RES_WATERMARK_BELOW_LOW,
> +	RES_WATERMARK_ABOVE_LOW,
> +	RES_WATERMARK_ABOVE_HIGH,
> +};
> +
>  struct res_counter {
>  	/*
>  	 * the current resource consumption level
> @@ -33,10 +39,19 @@
>  	 */
>  	unsigned long long failcnt;
>  	/*
> +	 * Watermarks
> +	 * Should be changed automatically when the limit is changed and
> +	 * keep low < high < limit.
> +	 */
> +	unsigned long long high_watermark;
> +	unsigned long long low_watermark;
> +	/*
>  	 * the lock to protect all of the above.
>  	 * the routines below consider this to be IRQ-safe
>  	 */
>  	spinlock_t lock;
> +	/* can be read without lock */
> +	enum watermark_state watermark_state;
>  };
>  
>  /*
> @@ -73,6 +88,8 @@
>  	RES_USAGE,
>  	RES_LIMIT,
>  	RES_FAILCNT,
> +	RES_HIGH_WATERMARK,
> +	RES_LOW_WATERMARK,

I'd prefer some shorter names. Like RES_HWMARK and RES_LWMARK.

>  };
>  
>  /*
> @@ -131,4 +148,17 @@
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Helper function for implementing high/low watermark to resource controller.
> + */
> +static inline bool res_counter_below_low_watermark(struct res_counter *cnt)
> +{
> +	return (cnt->watermark_state == RES_WATERMARK_BELOW_LOW);
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool res_counter_above_high_watermark(struct res_counter *cnt)
> +{
> +	return (cnt->watermark_state == RES_WATERMARK_ABOVE_HIGH);
> +}
> +
>  #endif
> Index: linux-2.6.24-rc3-mm1/kernel/res_counter.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.24-rc3-mm1.orig/kernel/res_counter.c	2007-11-28 14:33:19.000000000 +0900
> +++ linux-2.6.24-rc3-mm1/kernel/res_counter.c	2007-11-28 16:33:20.000000000 +0900
> @@ -17,6 +17,9 @@
>  {
>  	spin_lock_init(&counter->lock);
>  	counter->limit = (unsigned long long)LLONG_MAX;
> +	counter->low_watermark = (unsigned long long)LLONG_MAX;
> +	counter->high_watermark = (unsigned long long)LLONG_MAX;
> +	counter->watermark_state = RES_WATERMARK_BELOW_LOW;
>  }
>  
>  int res_counter_charge_locked(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val)
> @@ -27,6 +30,15 @@
>  	}
>  
>  	counter->usage += val;
> +
> +	if (counter->usage > counter->high_watermark) {
> +		counter->watermark_state = RES_WATERMARK_ABOVE_HIGH;
> +		return 0;
> +	}

"else" would look much better here :)

> +	if (counter->usage > counter->low_watermark)
> +		counter->watermark_state = RES_WATERMARK_ABOVE_LOW;
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -47,6 +59,13 @@
>  		val = counter->usage;
>  
>  	counter->usage -= val;
> +
> +	if (counter->usage < counter->low_watermark) {
> +		counter->watermark_state = RES_WATERMARK_BELOW_LOW;
> +		return;
> +	}

and here

> +	if (counter->usage < counter->high_watermark)
> +		counter->watermark_state = RES_WATERMARK_ABOVE_LOW;
>  }
>  
>  void res_counter_uncharge(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val)
> @@ -69,6 +88,10 @@
>  		return &counter->limit;
>  	case RES_FAILCNT:
>  		return &counter->failcnt;
> +	case RES_HIGH_WATERMARK:
> +		return &counter->high_watermark;
> +	case RES_LOW_WATERMARK:
> +		return &counter->low_watermark;
>  	};
>  
>  	BUG();
> @@ -117,7 +140,7 @@
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  	char *buf, *end;
> -	unsigned long long flags, tmp, *val;
> +	unsigned long long flags, tmp, *val, limit, low, high;
>  
>  	buf = kmalloc(nbytes + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
>  	ret = -ENOMEM;
> @@ -141,6 +164,26 @@
>  			goto out_free;
>  	}
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&counter->lock, flags);
> +	/*
> +	 * High/Low watermark should be changed automatically AMAP.
> +	 */
> +	switch (member) {
> +		case RES_HIGH_WATERMARK:
> +			limit = res_counter_get(counter, RES_LIMIT);
> +			if (tmp > limit)
> +				goto out_free;
> +			low = res_counter_get(counter, RES_LOW_WATERMARK);
> +			if (tmp <= low)
> +				goto out_free;
> +			break;
> +		case RES_LOW_WATERMARK:
> +			high= res_counter_get(counter, RES_HIGH_WATERMARK);
> +			if (tmp >= high)
> +				goto out_free;
> +			break;

Why there's no checks for limit? Smth like

case RES_LIMIT:
	high = res_counter_get(counter, RES_HIGH_WATERMARK);
	if (tmp < high)
		goto out_free;

> +		default:
> +			break;
> +	}
>  	val = res_counter_member(counter, member);
>  	*val = tmp;
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&counter->lock, flags);
> @@ -150,3 +193,4 @@
>  out:
>  	return ret;
>  }
> +
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers