[Devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH] memory controller per zone patches take 2 [4/10] calculate mapped ratio for memory cgroup
YAMAMOTO Takashi
yamamoto at valinux.co.jp
Thu Nov 22 00:46:47 PST 2007
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 17:34:20 +0900 (JST)
> yamamoto at valinux.co.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
>
> > > > > + /* usage is recorded in bytes */
> > > > > + total = mem->res.usage >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > > > > + rss = mem_cgroup_read_stat(&mem->stat, MEM_CGROUP_STAT_RSS);
> > > > > + return (rss * 100) / total;
> > > >
> > > > Never tried 64 bit division on a 32 bit system. I hope we don't
> > > > have to resort to do_div() sort of functionality.
> > > >
> > > Hmm, maybe it's better to make these numebrs be just "long".
> > > I'll try to change per-cpu-counter implementation.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > -Kame
> >
> > besides that, i think 'total' can be zero here.
> >
> Ah, This is what I do now.
> ==
> +/*
> + * Calculate mapped_ratio under memory controller. This will be used in
> + * vmscan.c for deteremining we have to reclaim mapped pages.
> + */
> +int mem_cgroup_calc_mapped_ratio(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
> +{
> + long total, rss;
> +
> + /*
> + * usage is recorded in bytes. But, here, we assume the number of
> + * physical pages can be represented by "long" on any arch.
> + */
> + total = (long) (mem->res.usage >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> + rss = (long)mem_cgroup_read_stat(&mem->stat, MEM_CGROUP_STAT_RSS);
> + return (int)((rss * 100L) / total);
> +}
> ==
>
> maybe works well.
>
> -Kame
i meant that "/ total" can cause a division-by-zero exception.
YAMAMOTO Takashi
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list