[Devel] Re: [PATCH 1/3] The sysctl shadows
Pavel Emelyanov
xemul at openvz.org
Wed Nov 21 01:20:38 PST 2007
Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-11-20 at 14:43 +0300, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>> +static void ctl_free_table(struct ctl_table *t)
>> +{
>> + struct ctl_table *tmp;
>> +
>> + for (tmp = t; tmp->ctl_name || tmp->procname; tmp++)
>> + if (tmp->child)
>> + ctl_free_table(tmp->child);
>> +
>> + kfree(t);
>> +}
>
> Are you worried about the recursion at all?
I do, but
1. sysctl tables are _never_ deeper than 5 levels (as they
_always_ come from the kernel space)
2. registering sysctl tables happens from __init calls usually
so the stack is not filled at all
3. after implementing the sysctl paths this will vanish ;)
Moreover, this is not the only case of recursion in the kernel :)
Thanks,
Pavel
> -- Dave
>
>
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list