[Devel] Re: cleanup in workq and dst_destroy

[Benjamin Thery]

Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> Denis V. Lunev wrote:
>>> Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> while doing ipv6 namespace, we were faced to a problem with the loopback
>>>> and the dst_destroy function.
>>>>
>>>> When the network namespace exits, the cleanup function is called by
>>>> schedule_work and this function will browse the net ops list to call the
>>>> different exit methods for the registered subsystems.
>>>>
>>>> The different subsystems will shutdown their resources and in particular
>>>> addrconf subsystem will ifdown the loopback. This function will call
>>>> rt6_ifdown
>>>>  -> fib6_clean_all
>>>>   -> fib6_clean_node
>>>>    -> fib6_clean_tree
>>>>     -> fib6_clean_node
>>>>      -> fib6_del
>>>>       -> fib6_del_route
>>>>        -> rt6_release
>>>>         ->dst_free
>>>>          -> __dst_free
>>>>
>>>> The __dst_free function will schedule_delayed_work the dst_gc_work
>>>> function.
>>>>
>>>> The dst_gc_work will call dst_destroy and finally this one will call
>>>> dst->ops->destroy ops function which is ip6_dst_destroy.
>>>>
>>>> The problem here is we have the workq blocked because we are running
>>>> inside the netns cleanup function. So the delayed work will not run
>>>> until we exits the cleanup function. But the loopback is still
>>>> referenced by the ip6 routes, the netdev_unregister will loop
>>>> indefinitly => dead lock.
>>>>
>>>> By the way, this bug appears with ipv6 but it is perhaps pending with
>>>> ipv4.
>>>>
>>>> Benjamin as proposed to create a separate workq for the network
>>>> namespace, so in the worst case we have the unregister looping until the
>>>> ip6 route are shut downed. Is it an acceptable solution ?
>>>>
>>> we are doing this staff in the special thread. There are a lot of
>>> difficult things to perform like synchronize_net & netdev_run_todo inside
>> The special thread ? do you mean keventd_wq ?
>>
> I mean that network namespace deletion, i.e. all subsystem ->exit calls
> should be run outside of all current mechanisms in the separate thread,
> specially designated to namespace(s) stop.

Interesting.
How do you create the thread? Do you use a special workqueue to replace the 
use of the global keventd workqueue, as I proposed, or do you use another 
mechanism to create the thread?
I mean do you create one thread per exiting namespace (each time a namespace
is exiting you spawn a new thread for the cleanup) or do you create a workqueue
at system init where you'll queue all cleanup routines (cleanup_net) for all
exiting namespaces?

Currently, on our side, we have a small patch that creates a special 
workqueue in net_ns_init(), and we queue clean_net() in this workqueue
in __put_net(). 

Benjamin

-- 
B e n j a m i n   T h e r y  - BULL/DT/Open Software R&D

   http://www.bull.com
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers