[Devel] Re: [PATCH 0/13] Pid namespaces (OpenVZ view)
Eric W. Biederman
ebiederm at xmission.com
Thu May 24 11:56:53 PDT 2007
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue at us.ibm.com> writes:
>> 3. Cleaner logic for namespace migration: with this approach
>> one need to save the virtual pid and let global one change;
>> with Suka's logic this is not clear how to migrate the level
>> 2 namespace (concerning init to be level 0).
>
> This is a very good point.
>
> How *would* we migrate the pids at the second level?
As long as you don't try and restore pids into the initial pid namespace
it isn't a problem. You just record the pid hierarchy and the pid
for a task in that hierarchy. There really is nothing special going on
that should make migration hard.
Or did I miss something?
Eric
More information about the Devel
mailing list