[Devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes

[Dave Hansen]

On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 09:33 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> 
> 
> I still prefer that we forego that kthread, and just work toward
> allowing pid1 to exit.  Really I think the crufty /proc/<pid> handling
> is the only reason we were going to punt on that for now. 

It's everything _but_ the /proc/<pid> stuff.  /proc/{mem,cpu}info and
friends are the ones suspiciously tied to pid 1.

-- Dave

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers