[Devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes
Serge E. Hallyn
serue at us.ibm.com
Wed Mar 21 13:29:41 PDT 2007
Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm at xmission.com):
> Cedric Le Goater <clg at fr.ibm.com> writes:
>
> >>> what about a kthread that would be spawned when a task is cloned in an
> >>> unshared pid namespace ? This is an extra cost in term of tasks.
> >>
> >> If you use kernel_thread this can happen. (Die kernel_thread).
> >> If you use the kthread interface keventd will be the parent process and
> >> we won't have problems.
> >
> > so is it something acceptable for mainline ? I think openvz has such
> > a thread doing the reaping.
>
> Please clarify. Is what acceptable for mainline?
I think Cedric is thinking about a per-pidnamespace reaper thread.
I think you and I are just thinking of walking a list of all the
processes with a pid in the namespace, and killing each.
-serge
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list