[Devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes

[Eric W. Biederman]

"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue at us.ibm.com> writes:

>
> So how do you see us enforcing pid1's existance?  Somehow keep it from
> fully exiting, or just kill all the processes in it's namespace if it
> exits?

Killing all other processes in the namespace when pid1 exits is what
I implemented last time around.

Eric
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers