[Devel] Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 1/7] containers (V7): Generic container system abstracted from cpusets code
Srivatsa Vaddagiri
vatsa at in.ibm.com
Thu Mar 8 02:38:08 PST 2007
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 12:50:03PM -0800, Paul Menage wrote:
> The callback mutex (which is what container_lock() actually locks) is
> also used to synchronize fork/exit against subsystem additions, in the
> event that some subsystem has registered fork or exit callbacks. We
> could probably have a separate subsystem_mutex for that instead.
Why can't manage_mutex itself be used there (to serialize fork/exit callbacks
against modification to hierarchy)?
> Apart from that, yes, it may well be possible to move callback lock
> entirely inside cpusets.
Yes, that way only the hierarchy hosting cpusets takes the hit of
double-locking. cpuset_subsys->create/destroy can take this additional lock
inside cpuset.c.
--
Regards,
vatsa
More information about the Devel
mailing list