[Devel] Re: Pid namespaces approaches testing results

[Cedric Le Goater]

> The flat model has many optimization ways in comparison with the multilevel
> one. Like we can cache the pid value on structs and some other.
> 
> Moreover having generic level nesting sounds reasonable. Having single level
> nesting - too as all the namespace we have are single nested. But having the
> 4 level nesting sounds strange... Why 4? Why not 5? What if I don't know how
> many I will need exactly, but do know that it will be definitely more than 1?
> 
> Moreover - I have shown that we can have 1% or less performance on generic
> nesting model, why not keep it?

did you send that patchset ? is it included in the one you sent ?

sorry if i missed something :( 

C.
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers