[Devel] Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/3] containers: introduction

Paul Menage menage at google.com
Thu Jan 11 17:33:19 PST 2007


On 1/11/07, Serge E. Hallyn <serue at us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> That's what's holding me back here - I'm still not sure whether
> to proceed with a separate implementation, proceed with the
> current implementation of Paul's containers, or wait for an
> update from Paul responding to your feedback.

I think that having just a single process-grouping infrastructure in
the kernel, rather than separate ones for CPUsets, virtual servers,
BeanCounters, ResGroups, etc, is definitely something we should aim
for, provided that the requirements for virtual servers aren't too
different to those for other users.

I've been thinking about how the container_clone() function would need
to work. Essentially, the sequence would be something like the
following:

1) do_fork() or sys_unshare() see that some ns_proxy bits have
changed, and call container_clone(&nsproxy_subsys)

In container_clone():

2) Check that the ns_proxy container subsystem was bound to some
hierarchy; if not, find an unused hierarchy and bind ns_proxy
subsystem to it. (Or fail with -EBUSY if there are no free container
subsystems). By the end of this step, ns_proxy is bound to hierarchy
H.

3) Create a new subcontainer of the current process' container in
hierarchy H. This will involve some VFS manipulation, since normally
container creation operations are as part of a mkdir operation, but
shouldn't be too tricky.

4) Move the current process (or possibly the new child process in the
case of do_fork() ) into that container. (This doesn't affect the
container mappings of the current or child process in any hierarchies
other than H).

So in general if you wanted to combine ns_proxy isolation and resource
isolation, you'd mount an instance of containerfs that bound both the
ns_proxy subsystem and any resource controllers that you wanted, prior
to creating any virtual servers. Alternatively you could have a
separate hierarchy for the resource controllers and manually move the
new virtual server's root process into the appropriate resource
control container.

Paul




More information about the Devel mailing list