[Devel] Re: [patch 1/2] [RFC] Simple tamper-proof device filesystem.
Serge E. Hallyn
serue at us.ibm.com
Mon Dec 17 16:39:55 PST 2007
Quoting Tetsuo Handa (penguin-kernel at i-love.sakura.ne.jp):
> Hello.
>
> Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > CAP_MKNOD will be removed from its capability
> I think it is not enough because the root can rename/unlink device files
> (mv /dev/sda1 /dev/tmp; mv /dev/sda2 /dev/sda1; mv /dev/tmp /dev/sda2).
Sure but that doesn't bother us :)
The admin in the container has his own /dev directory and can do what he
likes with the devices he's allowed to have. He just shouldn't have
access to others. If he wants to rename /dev/sda1 to /dev/sda5 that's
his choice.
> > To use your approach, i guess we would have to use selinux (or tomoyo)
> > to enforce that devices may only be created under /dev?
> Everyone can use this filesystem alone.
Sure but it is worthless alone.
No?
What will keep the container admin from doing 'mknod /root/hda1 b 3 1'?
> But use with MAC (or whatever access control mechanisms that prevent
> attackers from unmounting/overlaying this filesystem) is recomennded.
-serge
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list