[Devel] Re: [PATCH 9/9] signal: Ignore signals sent to the pid namespace init

Eric W. Biederman ebiederm at xmission.com
Thu Dec 13 10:33:10 PST 2007


ebiederm at xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes:
>
> Yes.  If we are not in process context (in_interrupt) we do infer
> the sender incorrectly.  Duh.  I saw something in earlier patches
> people had posted didn't understand it, and didn't get an answer
> when I asked about it. 

Grr. Rather I didn't see a reply when I asked about it.  I just
spotted Suka's old reply telling me it was to attempt to prevent
init from getting sigio.    Clearly I have a big fat blind spot
here you could drive a truck through.

Kernel generated signals are a pain because they are neither fish nor
fowl. They are sent privileged, but we don't necessarily want to give
them all curtsies and deliver them.  Grr.

Eric
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers




More information about the Devel mailing list