[Devel] Re: [PATCH 2.6.25] netns: struct net content re-work
Eric W. Biederman
ebiederm at xmission.com
Mon Dec 10 19:52:56 PST 2007
The idea of separate structures make sense, and seems needed and useful.
"Denis V. Lunev" <den at openvz.org> writes:
> diff --git a/include/net/netns/unix.h b/include/net/netns/unix.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..27b4e7f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/net/netns/unix.h
^^^^^^
Given that we are making this per protocol adding a separate directory
to hold them seems to be the wrong grouping. Ideally we want everything
for the protocol all together in the same location so it is easy
to find. Possibly with a user/kernel split.
So perhaps unix_net.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> +/*
> + * Unix network namespace
> + */
> +#ifndef __NETNS_UNIX_H__
> +#define __NETNS_UNIX_H__
> +
> +struct ctl_table_header;
> +struct netns_unix {
> + int sysctl_unix_max_dgram_qlen;
> + struct ctl_table_header *unix_ctl;
> +};
How about struct unix_net? I think that tracks a little better
with how we have done struct in_device, ip6_dev and their friends.
Eric
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list