[Devel] Re: [PATCH] pid: sys_wait... fixes
Eric W. Biederman
ebiederm at xmission.com
Thu Dec 6 09:21:39 PST 2007
Oleg Nesterov <oleg at tv-sign.ru> writes:
> On 12/05, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>
>> This modifies do_wait and eligible_child to take a pair of
>> enum pid_type and struct pid *pid to precisely specify what
>> set of processes are eligible to be waited for, instead of the
>> raw pid_t value from sys_wait4.
>
> Personally, I like this patch very much. Not only it fixes the bug,
> in my opinion it also makes the code more clean.
>
> However at first glance it has a minor fixable problem,
>
>> + if (type < PIDTYPE_MAX) {
>> + if (p->pids[type].pid != pid)
>> return 0;
>> }
>
> If type != PIDTYPE_PID we can't trust p->pids[type].pid unless p is a
> group leader. This .pid could be just a "random value".
Ugh. You are correct. Thanks for the review.
That is one annoying special case.
Eric
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list