[Devel] [PATCH 7/9] SMP Load balance changes

Srivatsa Vaddagiri vatsa at in.ibm.com
Thu Apr 12 10:58:44 PDT 2007


When balancing tasks across CPU runqueues, we need to take into account the 
quota of task-groups (for example: we dont want to pull all tasks of a group
with 90% limit on the same CPU).

This is easily accomplished by piggy backing on the smpnice mechanism.

This patch also modifies move_tasks() to look at all the arrays of runqueue for 
pulling tasks.

Signed-off-by : Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa at in.ibm.com>

---

---

 1 file changed, 119 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)


---


diff -puN kernel/sched.c~smp kernel/sched.c
--- linux-2.6.20/kernel/sched.c~smp	2007-04-12 09:10:38.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.20-vatsa/kernel/sched.c	2007-04-12 11:07:15.000000000 +0530
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ struct task_grp_rq {
 	unsigned long expired_timestamp;
 	unsigned short ticks, long_ticks;
   	int prio;			/* Priority of the task-group */
-	unsigned long last_update;
+	unsigned long last_update, raw_weighted_load;
 	struct list_head list;
 	struct task_grp *tg;
 };
@@ -925,6 +925,11 @@ static inline int __normal_prio(struct t
 #define RTPRIO_TO_LOAD_WEIGHT(rp) \
 	(PRIO_TO_LOAD_WEIGHT(MAX_RT_PRIO) + LOAD_WEIGHT(rp))
 
+static inline int cpu_quota(struct task_grp *tg)
+{
+	return (tg->ticks * 100) / CPU_CONTROL_SHORT_WINDOW;
+}
+
 static void set_load_weight(struct task_struct *p)
 {
 	if (has_rt_policy(p)) {
@@ -938,21 +943,25 @@ static void set_load_weight(struct task_
 			p->load_weight = 0;
 		else
 #endif
-			p->load_weight = RTPRIO_TO_LOAD_WEIGHT(p->rt_priority);
+			p->load_weight = (RTPRIO_TO_LOAD_WEIGHT(p->rt_priority)
+						* cpu_quota(task_grp(p))) / 100;
 	} else
-		p->load_weight = PRIO_TO_LOAD_WEIGHT(p->static_prio);
+		p->load_weight = (PRIO_TO_LOAD_WEIGHT(p->static_prio)
+						* cpu_quota(task_grp(p))) / 100;
 }
 
 static inline void
-inc_raw_weighted_load(struct rq *rq, const struct task_struct *p)
+inc_raw_weighted_load(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
 {
 	rq->raw_weighted_load += p->load_weight;
+	task_grp_rq(p)->raw_weighted_load += p->load_weight;
 }
 
 static inline void
-dec_raw_weighted_load(struct rq *rq, const struct task_struct *p)
+dec_raw_weighted_load(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
 {
 	rq->raw_weighted_load -= p->load_weight;
+	task_grp_rq(p)->raw_weighted_load -= p->load_weight;
 }
 
 static inline void inc_nr_running(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq)
@@ -2295,42 +2304,30 @@ int can_migrate_task(struct task_struct 
 	return 1;
 }
 
-#define rq_best_prio(rq) min((rq)->curr->prio, (rq)->expired->best_static_prio)
+#define rq_best_prio(rq) min((rq)->active->best_dyn_prio, \
+				 (rq)->expired->best_static_prio)
 
-/*
- * move_tasks tries to move up to max_nr_move tasks and max_load_move weighted
- * load from busiest to this_rq, as part of a balancing operation within
- * "domain". Returns the number of tasks moved.
- *
- * Called with both runqueues locked.
- */
-static int move_tasks(struct rq *this_rq, int this_cpu, struct rq *busiest,
-		      unsigned long max_nr_move, unsigned long max_load_move,
-		      struct sched_domain *sd, enum idle_type idle,
-		      int *all_pinned)
+static int __move_tasks(struct task_grp_rq *this_rq, int this_cpu,
+			struct task_grp_rq *busiest, unsigned long max_nr_move,
+			unsigned long max_load_move, struct sched_domain *sd,
+			enum idle_type idle, int *all_pinned, long *load_moved)
 {
 	int idx, pulled = 0, pinned = 0, this_best_prio, best_prio,
-	    best_prio_seen, skip_for_load;
+	    best_prio_seen = 0, skip_for_load;
 	struct prio_array *array, *dst_array;
 	struct list_head *head, *curr;
 	struct task_struct *tmp;
-	long rem_load_move;
+	long rem_load_move, grp_load_diff;
+
+	grp_load_diff = busiest->raw_weighted_load - this_rq->raw_weighted_load;
+	rem_load_move = grp_load_diff/2;
 
-	if (max_nr_move == 0 || max_load_move == 0)
+	if (grp_load_diff < 0 || max_nr_move == 0 || max_load_move == 0)
 		goto out;
 
-	rem_load_move = max_load_move;
 	pinned = 1;
 	this_best_prio = rq_best_prio(this_rq);
 	best_prio = rq_best_prio(busiest);
-	/*
-	 * Enable handling of the case where there is more than one task
-	 * with the best priority.   If the current running task is one
-	 * of those with prio==best_prio we know it won't be moved
-	 * and therefore it's safe to override the skip (based on load) of
-	 * any task we find with that prio.
-	 */
-	best_prio_seen = best_prio == busiest->curr->prio;
 
 	/*
 	 * We first consider expired tasks. Those will likely not be
@@ -2379,7 +2376,7 @@ skip_queue:
 	if (skip_for_load && idx < this_best_prio)
 		skip_for_load = !best_prio_seen && idx == best_prio;
 	if (skip_for_load ||
-	    !can_migrate_task(tmp, busiest, this_cpu, sd, idle, &pinned)) {
+	    !can_migrate_task(tmp, task_rq(tmp), this_cpu, sd, idle, &pinned)) {
 
 		best_prio_seen |= idx == best_prio;
 		if (curr != head)
@@ -2388,7 +2385,8 @@ skip_queue:
 		goto skip_bitmap;
 	}
 
-	pull_task(busiest, array, tmp, this_rq, dst_array, this_cpu);
+	pull_task(task_rq(tmp), array, tmp, cpu_rq(this_cpu), dst_array,
+								 this_cpu);
 	pulled++;
 	rem_load_move -= tmp->load_weight;
 
@@ -2414,9 +2412,98 @@ out:
 
 	if (all_pinned)
 		*all_pinned = pinned;
+	*load_moved = grp_load_diff/2 - rem_load_move;
 	return pulled;
 }
 
+static inline int choose_next_array(struct prio_array *arr[], int start_idx)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = start_idx; arr[i]; i++)
+		if (arr[i]->nr_active)
+			break;
+
+	return i;
+}
+
+/*
+ * move_tasks tries to move up to max_nr_move tasks and max_load_move weighted
+ * load from busiest to this_rq, as part of a balancing operation within
+ * "domain". Returns the number of tasks moved.
+ *
+ * Called with both runqueues locked.
+ */
+static int move_tasks(struct rq *this_rq, int this_cpu, struct rq *busiest,
+		      unsigned long max_nr_move, unsigned long max_load_move,
+		      struct sched_domain *sd, enum idle_type idle,
+		      int *all_pinned)
+{
+	struct task_grp_rq *busy_grp, *this_grp;
+	long load_moved;
+	unsigned long total_nr_moved = 0, nr_moved;
+	int idx;
+	int arr_idx = 0;
+	struct list_head *head, *curr;
+	struct prio_array *array, *array_prefs[5];
+
+
+	/* order in which tasks are picked up */
+	array_prefs[0] = busiest->greedy_expired;
+	array_prefs[1] = busiest->greedy_active;
+	array_prefs[2] = busiest->expired;
+	array_prefs[3] = busiest->active;
+	array_prefs[4] = NULL;
+
+	arr_idx = choose_next_array(array_prefs, arr_idx);
+	array = array_prefs[arr_idx++];
+
+	if (!array)
+		goto out;
+
+new_array:
+	/* Start searching at priority 0: */
+	idx = 0;
+skip_bitmap:
+	if (!idx)
+		idx = sched_find_first_bit(array->bitmap);
+	else
+		idx = find_next_bit(array->bitmap, MAX_PRIO, idx);
+	if (idx >= MAX_PRIO) {
+		arr_idx = choose_next_array(array_prefs, arr_idx);
+		array = array_prefs[arr_idx++];
+		if (!array)
+			goto out;
+		goto new_array;
+	}
+
+	head = array->queue + idx;
+	curr = head->prev;
+skip_queue:
+	busy_grp = list_entry(curr, struct task_grp_rq, list);
+	this_grp = busy_grp->tg->rq[this_cpu];
+
+	curr = curr->prev;
+
+	nr_moved = __move_tasks(this_grp, this_cpu, busy_grp, max_nr_move,
+			max_load_move, sd, idle, all_pinned, &load_moved);
+
+	total_nr_moved += nr_moved;
+	max_nr_move -= nr_moved;
+	max_load_move -= load_moved;
+
+	if (!max_nr_move || (long)max_load_move <= 0)
+		goto out;
+
+	if (curr != head)
+		goto skip_queue;
+	idx++;
+	goto skip_bitmap;
+
+out:
+	return total_nr_moved;
+}
+
 /*
  * find_busiest_group finds and returns the busiest CPU group within the
  * domain. It calculates and returns the amount of weighted load which
@@ -7521,11 +7608,6 @@ static int sched_set_quota(struct task_g
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static inline int cpu_quota(struct task_grp *tg)
-{
-	return (tg->ticks * 100) / CPU_CONTROL_SHORT_WINDOW;
-}
-
 /* Return assigned quota for this group */
 static int sched_get_quota(struct task_grp *tg)
 {
@@ -7555,6 +7637,7 @@ static void sched_move_task(struct task_
 		/* Set tsk->group to tg_old here */
 		deactivate_task(tsk, rq);
 		/* Set tsk->group to tg_new here */
+		set_load_weight(tsk);
 		__activate_task(tsk, rq);
 	}
 
_
-- 
Regards,
vatsa
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers




More information about the Devel mailing list