[Devel] Re: [PATCH] net: Add etun driver

[Johannes Berg]

On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 18:52 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:

> I'm not sure I'm following. I was under the impression that the
> conclusion of yesterdays discussion was that its probably not
> worth using rtnetlink for wireless so it will continue to use
> generic netlink exclusively, but even if that is wrong, nothing
> would prevent adding a "rtnetlink family" for wireless as well.

Oh, ok. Yeah nothing stops us from doing that, of course.

johannes
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.openvz.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20070411/9500116c/attachment-0001.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers