[Devel] Re: [ckrm-tech] [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction

[Paul Menage]

On 9/20/06, Christoph Lameter <clameter at sgi.com> wrote:
>
> I think we should have one container mechanism instead of multiple. Maybe
> merge the two? The cpuset functionality is well established and working
> right.

The basic container abstraction provided by cpusets is very nice -
maybe rename it from "cpuset" to "container"? Since it already
provides access to memory nodes as well as cpus, and could be extended
to handle other resource types too (network, disk).

Paul