[Devel] Re: [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction
Rohit Seth
rohitseth at google.com
Wed Sep 20 16:39:29 PDT 2006
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 16:36 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Rohit Seth wrote:
>
> > > How does the containers implementation under discussion behave if a
> > > process is part of a container and the container is removed?
> > It first removes all the tasks belonging to this container (which means
> > resetting the container pointers in task_struct and then per page
> > container pointer belonging to anonymous pages). It then clears the
> > container pointers in the mapping structure and also in the pages
> > belonging to these files.
>
> So the application continues to run unharmed?
>
It will hit a one time penalty of getting those pointers reset, but
besides that it will continue to run fine.
> Could we equip containers with restrictions on processors and nodes for
> NUMA?
>
Yes. That is something we will have to do (I think part of CPU
handler-TBD).
-rohit
More information about the Devel
mailing list