[Devel] [RFC][PATCH 1/2] add user namespace [try #2]

[Serge E. Hallyn]

Quoting Herbert Poetzl (herbert at 13thfloor.at):
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 12:29:05PM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Herbert Poetzl (herbert at 13thfloor.at):
> > > On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 08:05:30PM +0400, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> > > > BTW...
> > > > 
> > > > > --- 2.6.18-rc4-mm3.orig/include/linux/sched.h
> > > > > +++ 2.6.18-rc4-mm3/include/linux/sched.h
> > > > > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> > > > >  #define CLONE_STOPPED		0x02000000	/* Start in stopped state */
> > > > >  #define CLONE_NEWUTS		0x04000000	/* New utsname group? */
> > > > >  #define CLONE_NEWIPC		0x08000000	/* New ipcs */
> > > > > +#define CLONE_NEWUSER		0x10000000	/* New user */
> > > > we have place for 3 namespaces more only.
> > > > Does anyone have a plan what to do then?
> > > 
> > > what about having a new clone syscall with 32 or 
> > > better 64 bits reserved for namespace stuff, and
> > > only put basic/generic namespaces or even aggregate
> > > flags into the existing clone interface?
> > > 
> > > something like: uts+ipc+user -> CLONE_NEWXYZ
> > > but CLONE2_NEWUTS, CLONE2_NEWIPC, CLONE2_NEWUSER
> > > 
> > > best,
> > > Herbert
> > > 
> > > PS: what happened to the idea of forwarding
> > > this whole stuff to _both_ mailing lists?
> > > as far as I can tell we are adding those lists
> > > every now and then to the CC, could that be
> > > addressed soon?
> > 
> > My understanding is that both openvz and vserver should
> > be subscribed to the containers list.
> > 
> > Is that not the case?
> 
> not that I would know of .. but maybe our list is
> misconfigured, you'll never know, please double
> check on your side too

The vserver list is in fact subscribed.  Do you have some logs you can
check to see whether container at lists.osdl.org messages are being dropped
for some reason?

thanks,
-serge
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.osdl.org
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/containers