[Devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] add user namespace [try #2]

Cedric Le Goater clg at fr.ibm.com
Mon Sep 11 01:59:04 PDT 2006


Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 02:01:00PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Kirill Korotaev <dev at sw.ru> writes:
>>
>>> BTW...
>>>
>>>> --- 2.6.18-rc4-mm3.orig/include/linux/sched.h
>>>> +++ 2.6.18-rc4-mm3/include/linux/sched.h
>>>> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
>>>> #define CLONE_STOPPED 0x02000000 /* Start in stopped state */
>>>>  #define CLONE_NEWUTS		0x04000000	/* New utsname group? */
>>>>  #define CLONE_NEWIPC		0x08000000	/* New ipcs */
>>>> +#define CLONE_NEWUSER		0x10000000	/* New user */
>>> we have place for 3 namespaces more only.
>>> Does anyone have a plan what to do then?
>>> I warned about this at the beginning when we were discussing the interfaces
>>> and this flags soon going to be exhausted, so probably it is time to
>>> do something in advance...
>> Actually there is another unused bit in the middle :)
>> Plus there are a bunch of bits that unshare can use but clone can't.
>> Plus what other namespaces are on the todo list?
>> We have network, and pid, and time.
>> What else?
>
> resource (could be limits and/or accounting), 
> lightweight-net, (maybe fs in contrast to vfs)

I guess we're reaching the limits anyway and it would not leave much room
in the clone flags for other features not related to containers.

It's not like we're adding one or two, we would take at least 6 : uts, ipc,
user, pid, net, time, etc. I'm sure ideas to extend the list will come when
this is in use ...

C.




More information about the Devel mailing list