[Devel] Re: [PATCH 0/7] Generic Process Containers (+ ResGroups/BeanCounters)
Paul Jackson
pj at sgi.com
Wed Nov 29 23:32:29 PST 2006
I got a chance to build and test this patch set, to see if it behaved
like I expected cpusets to behave, on an ia64 SN2 Altix system.
Two details - otherwise looked good. I continue to like this
approach.
The two details are (1) /proc/<pid>/cpuset not configured by
default if CPUSETS configured, and (2) a locking bug wedging
tasks trying to rmdir a cpuset off the notify_on_release hook.
1) I had to enable CONFIG_PROC_PID_CPUSET. I used the following
one line change to do this. I am willing to consider, in due
time, phasing out such legacy cpuset support. But so long as it
is small stuff that is not getting in anyone's way, I think we
should take our sweet time about doing so -- as in a year or two
after marking it deprecated or some such. No sense deciding that
matter now; keep the current cpuset API working throughout any
transitition to container based cpusets, then revisit the question
of whether to deprecate and eventually remove these kernel API
details, later on, after the major reconstruction dust settles.
In general, we try to avoid removing kernel API's, especially if
they are happily being used and working and not causing anyone
grief.
============================ begin ============================
--- 2.6.19-rc5.orig/init/Kconfig 2006-11-29 21:14:48.071114833 -0800
+++ 2.6.19-rc5/init/Kconfig 2006-11-29 22:19:02.015166048 -0800
@@ -268,6 +268,7 @@ config CPUSETS
config PROC_PID_CPUSET
bool "Include legacy /proc/<pid>/cpuset file"
depends on CPUSETS
+ default y if CPUSETS
config CONTAINER_CPUACCT
bool "Simple CPU accounting container subsystem"
============================= end =============================
2) I wedged the kernel on the container_lock, doing a removal of a cpuset
using notify_on_release.
Right now, that test system has the following two tasks, wedged:
============================ begin ============================
F S UID PID PPID C PRI NI ADDR SZ WCHAN STIME TTY TIME CMD
0 S root 4992 34 0 71 -5 - 380 wait 22:51 ? 00:00:00 /bin/sh /sbin/cpuset_release_agent /cpuset_test_tree
0 D root 4994 4992 0 72 -5 - 200 contai 22:51 ? 00:00:00 rmdir /dev/cpuset//cpuset_test_tree
============================= end =============================
I had a cpuset called /cpuset_test_tree, and some sub-cpusets
below it. I marked it 'notify_on_release' and then removed all
tasks from it, and then removed the child cpusets that it had.
Removing that last child cpuset presumably triggered the above
callout to /sbin/cpuset_release_agent, which called rmdir.
That wait address (from /proc/4994/stat) in hex is a0000001000f1060,
and my System.map has the two lines:
a0000001000f1040 T container_lock
a0000001000f1360 T container_manage_unlock
So it is wedged in container_lock.
I have subsequently also wedged an 'ls' command trying to scan this
/dev/cpuset directory, waiting in the kernel routine vfs_readdir
(not surprising, given that I'm in the middle of doing a rmdir on
that directory.)
If you don't immediately see the problem, I can go back and get a
kernel stack trace or whatever else you need.
This lockup occurred the first, and thus far only, time that I tried
to use notify_on_release to rmdir a cpuset. So I presume it is an
easy failure for me to reproduce.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj at sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401
More information about the Devel
mailing list