[Devel] RE: [PATCH 1/1] scsi : megaraid_{mm, mbox}: a fix on 64-bit DMA capability check
Ju, Seokmann
Seokmann.Ju at lsil.com
Tue Jun 20 07:06:16 PDT 2006
Hi Vasily,
Tuesday, June 20, 2006 9:53 AM, Vasily Averin wrote:
> As far as I see the 64-bit magic is set, pci(0xA4) == 0x0299
> and driver tries to
> enable 64-bit DMA. However the controller is not supported
> 64-bit DMA, and I
> still have the same error messages.
>
> Could you please check this issue and update your patch properly.
I'll double check with F/W team for further clarification and will submit updated patch, soon.
Thank you for pointing out and sorry for inconvenience.
Seokmann
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vasily Averin [mailto:vvs at sw.ru]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 9:53 AM
> To: Ju, Seokmann
> Cc: James Bottomley; Andrew Morton;
> linux-scsi at vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org;
> devel at openvz.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] scsi : megaraid_{mm,mbox}: a fix on
> 64-bit DMA capability check
>
> Hello Seokmann,
>
> I would like to tell you that your patch is wrong, at least for
> MegaRAID SATA 150-4 RAID Controller
>
> 06:02.0 RAID bus controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic
> MegaRAID (rev 01)
> Subsystem: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic MegaRAID SATA
> 150-4 RAID Controller
> 00: 00 10 60 19 16 03 b0 04 01 00 04 01 08 20 00 00
> 10: 08 00 20 df 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 10 23 45
> 30: 00 00 00 00 80 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0a 01 00 00
> 40: 00 00 ff ff 00 00 00 d0 08 00 00 fc 00 00 00 fc
> 50: 00 00 00 d0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 60: 00 00 00 00 88 1f 00 00 00 00 00 f8 00 00 00 00
> 70: 00 00 00 00 00 00 ff ff 00 00 f4 fe 00 00 00 00
> 80: 01 00 02 00 00 00 00 00 06 01 38 00 00 00 00 00
> 90: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 06 01 00 20 9c 00 00 00
> a0: cc cc 00 00 99 02 00 00 00 06 00 80 00 00 00 00
> b0: 00 00 00 6e 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 fd 01 00 00
> c0: fd 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> d0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> e0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> f0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>
> As far as I see the 64-bit magic is set, pci(0xA4) == 0x0299
> and driver tries to
> enable 64-bit DMA. However the controller is not supported
> 64-bit DMA, and I
> still have the same error messages.
>
> Could you please check this issue and update your patch properly.
>
> Thank you,
> Vasily Averin
>
> SWsoft Virtuozzo/OpenVZ Linux kernel team
>
> Ju, Seokmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This patch contains a fix for 64-bit DMA capability check in
> > megaraid_{mm,mbox} driver. With patch, the driver access PCI
> > configuration space with dedicated offset to read a
> signature. If the
> > signature read, it means that the controller has capability
> to handle
> > 64-bit DMA. Before this patch, the driver blindly claimed
> the capability
> > without checking with controller.
> > The issue has been reported by Vasily Averin [vvs at sw.ru]. Thank you
> > Vasily for the reporting.
>
> > +#define HBA_SIGNATURE_64BIT 0x0299
> > +#define PCI_CONF_AMISIG64 0xa4
> ...
> > - if (pci_set_dma_mask(adapter->pdev, DMA_64BIT_MASK) != 0) {
> > + pci_read_config_dword(adapter->pdev, PCI_CONF_AMISIG64,
> > &magic64);
> >
> > - con_log(CL_ANN, (KERN_WARNING
> > - "megaraid: could not set DMA mask for
> > 64-bit.\n"));
> > + if ((magic64 == HBA_SIGNATURE_64BIT) ||
> > + (adapter->pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_DELL &&
> > + adapter->pdev->device ==
> > PCI_DEVICE_ID_PERC4_DI_EVERGLADES) ||
> > + (adapter->pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_LSI_LOGIC &&
> > + adapter->pdev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_VERDE) ||
> > + (adapter->pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_LSI_LOGIC &&
> > + adapter->pdev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_DOBSON) ||
> > + (adapter->pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_DELL &&
> > + adapter->pdev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_PERC4E_DI_KOBUK)
> > ||
> > + (adapter->pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_LSI_LOGIC &&
> > + adapter->pdev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_LINDSAY)) {
> > + if (pci_set_dma_mask(adapter->pdev, DMA_64BIT_MASK) !=
> > 0) {
>
More information about the Devel
mailing list