[Devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/7] VPIDs: vpid/pid conversion in VPID enabled case

[Cedric Le Goater]

Kirill Korotaev wrote:

>> I think the "child reaper" question is not related to the (container,pid)
>> approach or the vpid approach. This is another question on who is the
>> parent of a container and how does it behaves.
> 
> it is related. How reaps the last process in container when it dies?
> what does waitpid() return?

The current init sigchild handler does that very well and is also pid
friendly :)

>> We have choosen to first follow a simple "path", complete pid isolation
>> being the main constraint : a container is created by exec'ing a
>> process in it.
> 
> Why to exec? It was asked already some times...

Just restarting the thread on how a container should be created ...

C.