[Devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/7] UBC: syscalls (user interface)
Rohit Seth
rohitseth at google.com
Wed Aug 16 11:17:57 PDT 2006
On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 19:39 +0400, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> Add the following system calls for UB management:
> 1. sys_getluid - get current UB id
> 2. sys_setluid - changes exec_ and fork_ UBs on current
> 3. sys_setublimit - set limits for resources consumtions
>
Why not have another system call for getting the current limits?
But as I said in previous mail, configfs seems like a better choice for
user interface. That way user has to go to one place to read/write
limits, see the current usage and other stats.
> Signed-Off-By: Pavel Emelianov <xemul at sw.ru>
> Signed-Off-By: Kirill Korotaev <dev at sw.ru>
...<snip>...
> +
> +/*
> + * The setbeanlimit syscall
> + */
> +asmlinkage long sys_setublimit(uid_t uid, unsigned long resource,
> + unsigned long *limits)
> +{
> + ub = beancounter_findcreate(uid, NULL, 0);
> + if (ub == NULL)
> + goto out;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ub->ub_lock, flags);
> + ub->ub_parms[resource].barrier = new_limits[0];
> + ub->ub_parms[resource].limit = new_limits[1];
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ub->ub_lock, flags);
> +
I think there should be a check here for seeing if the new limits are
lower than the current usage of a resource. If so then take appropriate
action.
-rohit
More information about the Devel
mailing list