[Debian] Bug#728173: ploop: FTBFS on non-x86: misses fallocate, syncfs syscall numbers
Aaron M. Ucko
ucko at debian.org
Tue Oct 29 11:13:42 PDT 2013
Ola Lundqvist <ola at inguza.com> writes:
> I raise this question as there is a problem to have a build dependency on
> ploop if ploop can not be built for the same (or more) architectures as
> vzctl.
Please note that AFAICT, ploop's failures on these architectures simply
stem from not looking in the right place for __NR_fallocate and
__NR_syncfs, hence my suggestion to include <sys/syscall.h>. It
compensates for this oversight on x86 by falling back on hardcoded
values, but doesn't know what numbers to use elsewhere.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?amu@monk.mit.edu
More information about the Debian
mailing list