[Debian] openvz updated

[maximilian attems]

hello kir,

On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 05:31:12PM +0400, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
> 
> (1) does 2.6.32-11 and -12 means 2.6.32.11 and 2.6.32.12
>      (i.e. -stable releases from greg k-h et al)?

not automaticaly, the first is the debian revision.
we strip the Makefile part of the stable series
it is more kind of coincidence that current debian versions nr
match upstream.

for -12 we might not wait for .12 as example.
 
> (2) If the answer to (1) is yes does it mean you merged in
>      2.6.32.11 and haven't seen any conflicts between it
>      and our patchset?

yes we merged 2.6.32.11 in 2.6.32-11 and there were no conflicts with
openvz. I would have moaned. ;)
 
> (3) do you need us to update our tree to 2.6.32.11
>      and then .12 (when it will be released). We will do
>      it anyway but can do it faster if you need.

guess the best is for your user that you keep merging in stable.
since it is easy with git to extract openvz patch. :)

BTW Ben Hutchings set up a git mirror, we will migrate to it post
squeeze release:
http://git.debian.org/?p=kernel/linux-2.6.git;a=summary

kind regards
maks