[Debian] Re: What version of debian kernel to use?
Ola Lundqvist
ola at opalsys.net
Fri Mar 2 05:00:21 EST 2007
Okei, charosj tjto znat aetot
S druzjeckim privjetom
// Ola
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 12:39:31PM +0300, Vasily Tarasov wrote:
> Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > Hi Vasily
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 12:32:30PM +0300, Vasily Tarasov wrote:
> >
> >> Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> >>
> >>> Privet
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 12:20:58PM +0300, Vasily Tarasov wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi again
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Have this changed form 007.1? Bacause I have not changed
> >>>>> the kernel configuration since then.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> How did it do in 007.1?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> Yes, in 007 kernel there was no !CONFIG_SECURITY dependency.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> I understand. Is there any specific reason why this conflict was
> >>> introduced. I think it can be harder to convince the release
> >>> managers to allow this version, unless I have a good explanation
> >>> for it. :)
> >>>
> >>>
> >> The explanation is very easy :) : At the moment OpenVZ confidently
> >> support only classical security model, other security models are not
> >> supported. So CONFIG_VE depends on !CONFIG_SECURITY.
> >>
> >
> > I see. But in 007 it supported all, or?
> >
> > I want to know if this is a feature or a bug. :)
> >
> It was a bug of 007 kernel, that there was no dependency in question. In
> 015 kernel the bug is fixed :)
>
> Vasily
> > Regards,
> >
> > // Ola
> >
> >
> >>> Regards,
> >>>
> >>> // Ola
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
--
--- Ola Lundqvist systemkonsult --- M Sc in IT Engineering ----
/ ola at opalsys.net Annebergsslingan 37 \
| opal at debian.org 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| http://opalsys.net/ Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Debian
mailing list