[Debian] Re: What version of debian kernel to use?
Ola Lundqvist
ola at opalsys.net
Fri Mar 2 04:35:46 EST 2007
Hi Vasily
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 12:32:30PM +0300, Vasily Tarasov wrote:
> Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > Privet
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 12:20:58PM +0300, Vasily Tarasov wrote:
> >
> >> Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi again
> >>>
> >>> Have this changed form 007.1? Bacause I have not changed
> >>> the kernel configuration since then.
> >>>
> >>> How did it do in 007.1?
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Yes, in 007 kernel there was no !CONFIG_SECURITY dependency.
> >>
> >
> > I understand. Is there any specific reason why this conflict was
> > introduced. I think it can be harder to convince the release
> > managers to allow this version, unless I have a good explanation
> > for it. :)
> >
> The explanation is very easy :) : At the moment OpenVZ confidently
> support only classical security model, other security models are not
> supported. So CONFIG_VE depends on !CONFIG_SECURITY.
I see. But in 007 it supported all, or?
I want to know if this is a feature or a bug. :)
Regards,
// Ola
> > Regards,
> >
> > // Ola
> >
> >
>
>
--
--- Ola Lundqvist systemkonsult --- M Sc in IT Engineering ----
/ ola at opalsys.net Annebergsslingan 37 \
| opal at debian.org 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| http://opalsys.net/ Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Debian
mailing list