[Debian] [vorlon@debian.org: Bug#400675: kernel-patch-openvz:
patch still not applying cleanly]
Ola Lundqvist
opal at debian.org
Fri Jan 26 13:10:28 EST 2007
Hi
Have tested it now and it do not apply cleanly:
patching file fs/compat.c
Hunk #7 FAILED at 894.
1 out of 8 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/compat.c.rej
patching file mm/fremap.c
Hunk #4 FAILED at 82.
1 out of 7 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file mm/fremap.c.rej
patching file mm/memory.c
patching file mm/memory.c
Hunk #2 succeeded at 60 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 107 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 324 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 423 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #6 succeeded at 434 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #7 succeeded at 489 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #8 succeeded at 497 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #9 succeeded at 547 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #10 succeeded at 587 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #11 succeeded at 611 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #12 succeeded at 647 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #13 succeeded at 674 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #14 succeeded at 728 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #15 succeeded at 743 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #16 succeeded at 1153 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #17 succeeded at 1170 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #18 succeeded at 1179 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #19 succeeded at 1219 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #20 succeeded at 1252 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #21 succeeded at 1276 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #22 succeeded at 1311 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #23 FAILED at 1521.
Hunk #24 succeeded at 1570 (offset -11 lines).
Hunk #25 succeeded at 1585 (offset -11 lines).
Hunk #26 succeeded at 1608 (offset -11 lines).
Hunk #27 succeeded at 1633 (offset -11 lines).
Hunk #28 succeeded at 1643 with fuzz 1 (offset -11 lines).
Hunk #29 succeeded at 1648 with fuzz 1 (offset -15 lines).
Hunk #30 succeeded at 2008 (offset -15 lines).
Hunk #31 succeeded at 2065 (offset -15 lines).
Hunk #32 succeeded at 2076 (offset -15 lines).
Hunk #33 succeeded at 2096 (offset -15 lines).
Hunk #34 succeeded at 2122 (offset -15 lines).
Hunk #35 succeeded at 2146 (offset -15 lines).
Hunk #36 succeeded at 2163 (offset -15 lines).
Hunk #37 FAILED at 2208.
Hunk #38 succeeded at 2217 (offset -16 lines).
Hunk #39 succeeded at 2232 (offset -16 lines).
Hunk #40 succeeded at 2306 with fuzz 2 (offset -20 lines).
Hunk #41 FAILED at 2320.
Hunk #42 succeeded at 2324 (offset -24 lines).
Hunk #43 succeeded at 2449 (offset -24 lines).
Hunk #44 succeeded at 2520 (offset -24 lines).
Hunk #45 succeeded at 2556 (offset -24 lines).
Hunk #46 succeeded at 2577 (offset -24 lines).
3 out of 46 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file mm/memory.c.rej
patching file mm/mprotect.c
Hunk #2 succeeded at 27 with fuzz 2.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 140.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 157 (offset -10 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 208 with fuzz 1 (offset -9 lines).
Hunk #6 succeeded at 319 (offset -9 lines).
1 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file mm/mprotect.c.rej
patching file net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c
Hunk #21 succeeded at 2011 with fuzz 2 (offset 2 lines).
Hunk #22 FAILED at 2029.
Hunk #23 succeeded at 2039 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #24 succeeded at 2064 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #25 succeeded at 2110 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #26 succeeded at 2136 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #27 succeeded at 2151 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #28 succeeded at 2262 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #29 succeeded at 2304 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #30 succeeded at 2317 (offset 1 line).
1 out of 30 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c.rej
The source is available at:
/usr/src at deb-build-amd64.openvz.org
It is also available as a deb file at http://ftp.fi.debian.org/debian/pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-source-2.6.18_2.6.18.dfsg.1-9_all.deb
Regards,
// Ola
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 06:57:10PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi
>
> New versions of the kernel will be made as it has serious bugs. I'll check
> if it applies during the weekend.
>
> Regards,
>
> // Ola
>
> ----- Forwarded message from Steve Langasek <vorlon at debian.org> -----
>
> Envelope-to: ola at opalsys.net
> Delivery-date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:46:27 +0100
> Subject: Bug#400675: kernel-patch-openvz: patch still not applying cleanly
> Reply-To: Steve Langasek <vorlon at debian.org>, 400675 at bugs.debian.org
> Resent-From: Steve Langasek <vorlon at debian.org>
> Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist at lists.debian.org
> Resent-CC: Ola Lundqvist <opal at debian.org>
> Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 09:48:14 +0000
> Resent-Message-ID: <handler.400675.B400675.11698045303564 at bugs.debian.org>
> X-Debian-PR-Message: report 400675
> X-Debian-PR-Package: kernel-patch-openvz
> X-Debian-PR-Keywords:
> X-Debian-PR-Source: kernel-patch-openvz
> From: Steve Langasek <vorlon at debian.org>
> To: Ola Lundqvist <ola at opalsys.net>, Kir Kolyshkin <kir at openvz.org>,
> 400675 at bugs.debian.org
> Cc: opal at debian.org, dev at openvz.org, dim at openvz.org, vtaras at openvz.org
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
> (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
> X-Spam-Level:
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
> autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
> Resent-Sender: Debian BTS <debbugs at bugs.debian.org>
> Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 01:48:15 -0800
> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
> X-Spamcheck-provider: Checked for spam by opalsys.net, postmaster at opalsys.net
>
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 10:35:04AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 12:33:33AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 08:45:21AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > > > Do you know if there will be more updates to the kernel after -8?
>
> > > Yes, there will.
>
> > Ok, good to know. Upsream and I are subscribed to the package
> > tracking system for such uploads so we should be informed quite quickly.
>
> You've probably seen by now that -9 has been uploaded. There will
> definitely be a -10 as well for etch, there are still outstanding RC bugs
> that need fixing; but -9 needs to be the final ABI and therefore shouldn't
> (I hope) be including any more large upstream merges.
>
> > > > If so I need to be prepared as that will probably break this patch.
>
> > > Why is this patch so fragile? If it breaks that easily, it hardly seems
> > > releasable -- how do we protect against it being broken by security updates?
>
> > the patch is very big (about 700k) and applies to huge amount of places in the
> > kernel. From 2.6.19 somekind of hook functionality is in place as
> > far as I understand, but for 2.6.18 it is not possible to use that. I do not
> > know if it solves all the problems though.
>
> > The problem have arized everytime the kernel team change from
> > 2.6.18 to 2.6.18.3 and then to 2.6.18.6. I do not think a problem have
> > arized when just doing minor updates, but I do not know for sure and it
> > depends on the update.
>
> Well, the lack of surety is what has me concerned.
>
> > But security updates may need to be coordinated.
>
> Is the security team aware that this is the case?
>
> > I assume that same problem can arize for vserver and xen patch, but those
> > patches are a part of the kernel source nowdays.
>
> Yes, which means any problems with those patches are detected at build time
> for the linux-2.6 package -- clearly not the case for openvz right now.
>
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 02:10:02PM +0300, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
> > One failed hunk in net/ipv6/udp.c -- looks like the patch from 2.6.18.5
> > is not applied to linux-source-2.6.18-7:
> > * http://tinyurl.com/2n9554
>
> > Six failed hunks in net/ipv4/ip_tables.c -- same, looks like a few
> > patches from 2.6.18.y-stable are not applied to linux-source-2.6.18-7. I
> > see at least the following ones:
> > * http://tinyurl.com/2l5sae
> > * http://tinyurl.com/38bgxa
> > * http://tinyurl.com/2wx9jz
>
> > I have just checked that after applying four patches linked above,
> > kernel-patch-openvz-028test007.1 applies cleanly on top of
> > linux-source-2.6.18-2.6.18-7.
>
> > Thus the question: are you tracking the -stable tree, and how closely do
> > you follow it?
>
> This bug was re-reported because the current version of the openvz patch
> package doesn't apply against the /previous/ version of the linux-2.6
> package. The common case here has been that the openvz patch hasn't been
> updated to apply to the current version of the linux-2.6 package.
>
> --
> Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
> Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
> vorlon at debian.org http://www.debian.org/
>
>
>
> ----- End forwarded message -----
>
> --
> --------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
> / opal at debian.org Annebergsslingan 37 \
> | ola at opalsys.net 654 65 KARLSTAD |
> | +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
> | http://opalsys.net/ UIN/icq: 4912500 |
> \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Debian mailing list
> Debian at openvz.org
> https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/debian
>
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ opal at debian.org Annebergsslingan 37 \
| ola at opalsys.net 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://opalsys.net/ UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Debian
mailing list