[CRIU] [PATCHv4 26/28] x86/vdso: Align VDSO functions by CPU L1 cache line

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Wed, 12 Jun 2019, Dmitry Safonov wrote:

> From: Andrei Vagin <avagin at gmail.com>
> 
> After performance testing VDSO patches a noticeable 20% regression was
> found on gettime_perf selftest with a cold cache.
> As it turns to be, before time namespaces introduction, VDSO functions
> were quite aligned to cache lines, but adding a new code to adjust
> timens offset inside namespace created a small shift and vdso functions
> become unaligned on cache lines.
> 
> Add align to vdso functions with gcc option to fix performance drop.
> 
> Coping the resulting numbers from cover letter:
> 
> Hot CPU cache (more gettime_perf.c cycles - the better):
>         | before     | CONFIG_TIME_NS=n | host        | inside timens
> --------|------------|------------------|-------------|-------------
> cycles  | 139887013  | 139453003        | 139899785   | 128792458
> diff (%)| 100        | 99.7             | 100         | 92

Why is CONFIG_TIME_NS=n behaving worse than current mainline and
worse than 'host' mode?

> Cold cache (lesser tsc per gettime_perf_cold.c cycle - the better):
>         | before     | CONFIG_TIME_NS=n | host        | inside timens
> --------|------------|------------------|-------------|-------------
> tsc     | 6748       | 6718             | 6862        | 12682
> diff (%)| 100        | 99.6             | 101.7       | 188

Weird, now CONFIG_TIME_NS=n is better than current mainline and 'host' mode
drops.

Either I'm misreading the numbers or missing something or I'm just confused
as usual :)

Thanks,

	tglx