[CRIU] [PATCH v2 5/5] compel: Add nspid, nssid and nspgid fields to struct seize_task_status
Kirill Tkhai
ktkhai at virtuozzo.com
Tue May 2 04:42:17 PDT 2017
On 02.05.2017 14:36, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> On 02.05.2017 13:06, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>> On 05/02/2017 12:18 PM, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>>> On 02.05.2017 11:58, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>>>> On 04/29/2017 09:12 AM, Andrei Vagin wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:03:08PM -0700, Andrei Vagin wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 06:57:07PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>>>>>>> Some users want them, so add these fields to the structure.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai at virtuozzo.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> compel/include/uapi/infect.h | 4 ++++
>>>>>>> compel/src/lib/infect.c | 6 ++++++
>>>>>>> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/compel/include/uapi/infect.h b/compel/include/uapi/infect.h
>>>>>>> index 7b681b0cb..4c6ab413d 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/compel/include/uapi/infect.h
>>>>>>> +++ b/compel/include/uapi/infect.h
>>>>>>> @@ -21,6 +21,10 @@ struct seize_task_status {
>>>>>>> int seccomp_mode;
>>>>>>> unsigned long long shdpnd;
>>>>>>> unsigned long long sigpnd;
>>>>>>> + size_t ns_levels;
>>>>>>> + uint32_t *nspid;
>>>>>>> + uint32_t *nspgid;
>>>>>>> + uint32_t *nssid;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here is the compel code and now we try to add fields which are
>>>>>> not used in compel. It doesn't look good.
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe we need to declare a new structure in criu which will encapsulate
>>>>> seize_task_status?
>>>>
>>>> We already have one ;) Called proc_status_creds.
>>>
>>> struct proc_status_creds is a mix entities of different types collected
>>> from different files. seize_task_status is the only structure for
>>> /proc/[pid]/status file, all content of this structure is collected
>>> from the single file. It's different things.
>>
>> proc_status_creds is also filled only with values collected from /proc/pid/status,
>> nothing more.
>
> But it has only statically stored values, and it has no problems like the problems
> solved in this patchset.
We may continue the way suggested via proc_status_creds and also allocate
uint32_t nspid[32];
uint32_t nspgid[32];
uint32_t nssid[32];
in the same structure, but let's introduce the generic memory-efficient solution.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> /* Add new members to the bottom and do not change existing */
>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/compel/src/lib/infect.c b/compel/src/lib/infect.c
>>>>>>> index 9ade844cf..ab7558a81 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/compel/src/lib/infect.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/compel/src/lib/infect.c
>>>>>>> @@ -190,11 +190,17 @@ static int skip_sigstop(int pid, int nr_signals)
>>>>>>> /* Init dynamically allocated fields in NULL and do not touch other */
>>>>>>> static void init_seize_task_status(struct seize_task_status *ss)
>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>> + ss->ns_levels = 0;
>>>>>>> + ss->nspid = ss->nspgid = ss->nssid = NULL;
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> /* Free dynamically allocated fields in compel_wait_task() and do not touch other */
>>>>>>> void compel_consume_seize_task_status(struct seize_task_status *ss)
>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>> + xfree(ss->nspid);
>>>>>>> + xfree(ss->nspgid);
>>>>>>> + xfree(ss->nssid);
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> init_seize_task_status(ss);
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> .
>>>
>>
More information about the CRIU
mailing list