[CRIU] [PATCH v2] page-pipe: (yet another) fix for split page-pipe buffers
Mike Rapoport
mike.rapoport at gmail.com
Fri Nov 25 08:44:24 PST 2016
Ping?
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Mike Rapoport <rppt at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Splitting of the trailing part of page-pipe buffer worked by coincidence
> for single page requests. Request longer than a single page were not
> handled correctly.
> The proper point for splitting the trailing part of the page-pipe buffer is
> the IOV following the IOV containing the desired page(s).
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> v2: after split of the trailing part, the pointer to ppb in page_pipe_split
> was not update and pointed to the wrong buffer
>
> criu/page-pipe.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/criu/page-pipe.c b/criu/page-pipe.c
> index 1981ff1..89cb27b 100644
> --- a/criu/page-pipe.c
> +++ b/criu/page-pipe.c
> @@ -393,10 +393,9 @@ static int page_pipe_split_iov(struct page_pipe *pp, struct page_pipe_buf *ppb,
> }
>
> static int page_pipe_split_ppb(struct page_pipe *pp, struct page_pipe_buf *ppb,
> - struct iovec *iov, unsigned long len)
> + struct iovec *iov, unsigned long len,
> + bool popup_new)
> {
> - struct page_pipe_buf *ppb_tmp;
> - struct iovec *iov_tmp = iov;
> struct page_pipe_buf *ppb_new;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -414,36 +413,10 @@ static int page_pipe_split_ppb(struct page_pipe *pp, struct page_pipe_buf *ppb,
> ppb->nr_segs -= ppb_new->nr_segs;
> ppb->pages_in -= len / PAGE_SIZE;
>
> + if (popup_new)
> + ppb = ppb_new;
> list_move(&ppb->l, &pp->bufs);
>
> - /*
> - * Only the leading iov's are split from the page_pipe_buffer.
> - * The complete page_pipe_buffer at the start of the page_pipe
> - * list will be deleted and therefore it is necessary to also
> - * move unrelated iov's to their own page_pipe_buffers.
> - */
> -
> - if (ppb->nr_segs <= len / PAGE_SIZE)
> - return 0;
> -
> - /* Move to the iov after the current request */
> - iov += len / PAGE_SIZE;
> - ret = page_pipe_split_ppb(pp, ppb, iov, len);
> - if (ret)
> - return -1;
> -
> - /*
> - * Rotate until correct head pointer. The function transmitting
> - * the page data expects that the head points to the right
> - * page_pipe_buffer. The complete first page_pipe_buffer is
> - * deleted even it contains additional elements.
> - */
> - ppb_tmp = list_first_entry(&pp->bufs, struct page_pipe_buf, l);
> - while (ppb_tmp->iov != iov_tmp) {
> - list_rotate_left(&pp->bufs);
> - ppb_tmp = list_first_entry(&pp->bufs, struct page_pipe_buf, l);
> - }
> -
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -471,14 +444,31 @@ int page_pipe_split(struct page_pipe *pp, unsigned long addr,
> return 0;
> }
>
> - /* split origingal ppb on boundary of iov that contains addr */
> + /*
> + * Split origingal ppb on boundary of iov that contains
> + * addr. The ppb containing the address will remain at the
> + * pp->buf list head.
> + */
> if (iov != ppb->iov) {
> len -= (addr - (unsigned long)iov->iov_base);
> - ret = page_pipe_split_ppb(pp, ppb, iov, len);
> + ret = page_pipe_split_ppb(pp, ppb, iov, len, false);
> if (ret)
> return -1;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Split the tail of the ppb. We presume that requests do not
> + * cross IOV (that is pagemap entry) boundaries.
> + * The newly created ppb will contain the desired IOV and will
> + * be poped to the head of the pp->buf list
> + */
> + if (ppb->nr_segs > 1) {
> + len = iov->iov_len;
> + ret = page_pipe_split_ppb(pp, ppb, iov + 1, len, true);
> + if (ret)
> + return -1;
> + ppb = list_first_entry(&pp->bufs, struct page_pipe_buf, l);
> + }
>
> /*
> * if address does not match iov base, split the iov and
> --
> 1.9.1
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
More information about the CRIU
mailing list