[CRIU] [PATCH 0/2] uffd: do not handle VDSO pages in lazy daemon

[Adrian Reber]

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 03:48:41PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> The VDSO is just a few pages and there's no actual cost at injecting those
> page into a process address space at the very begining.
> On the other hand, taking care of VDSO on the userfaultfd side creates
> undesired complexity which may be avoided.

Being clueless about VDSO I would like to understand if it is just not
possible/doesn't make much sense to restore VDSO pages, or if it just
adds undesired complexity which is not worth it as it really is a small
number of pages.

I am in no way against these patches, I would just like to understand it
better. Thanks.

		Adrian