[CRIU] [PATCH v5 08/11] unix: Resolve senders of packets in receive queue of DGRAM socket

Kirill Tkhai ktkhai at virtuozzo.com
Tue Jun 28 06:14:40 PDT 2016


On 28.06.2016 15:19, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> On 06/16/2016 04:54 PM, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>> Determine unique senders of packets in receive queue. If sender
>> is the only or if queue is empty, try to assign a queuer.
>> If there are several senders or if it's impossible to assign
>> a queuer, request the sender fle to be sent to task, who restores
>> the socket.
>>
>> In resolve_unix_peers(), there are the second iteration thru
>> unix_sockets. It's need to set peers of rest sockets: sockets
>> who are not queuer of someone. I do not merge it in the single
>> iteration, because of optimization reasons. The most sockets
>> should have peers set after the first iteration, so to call
>> find_unix_sk_by_ino() one more time is excess.
>>
>> v5: Use fle to send promious queue's senders.
>> Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai at virtuozzo.com>
>> ---
>>  criu/sk-unix.c |  156 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 143 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/criu/sk-unix.c b/criu/sk-unix.c
>> index 959b30d..b221a71 100644
>> --- a/criu/sk-unix.c
>> +++ b/criu/sk-unix.c
>> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
>>  #include "namespaces.h"
>>  #include "pstree.h"
>>  #include "crtools.h"
>> +#include "rst-malloc.h"
>>  
>>  #include "protobuf.h"
>>  #include "images/sk-unix.pb-c.h"
>> @@ -1334,7 +1335,7 @@ static int collect_one_unixsk(void *o, ProtobufCMessage *base, struct cr_img *i)
>>  	ui->ue = pb_msg(base, UnixSkEntry);
>>  	ui->name_dir = (void *)ui->ue->name_dir;
>>  
>> -	if (ui->ue->peer && !post_queued) {
>> +	if (!post_queued) {
>>  		post_queued = true;
>>  		if (add_post_prepare_cb(resolve_unix_peers, NULL))
>>  			return -1;
>> @@ -1392,11 +1393,152 @@ static void interconnected_pair(struct unix_sk_info *ui, struct unix_sk_info *pe
>>  	}
>>  }
>>  
>> +static int set_queuer(u32 s_ino, struct unix_sk_info *r_ui, unsigned count)
>> +{
>> +	u32 r_ino = r_ui->ue->ino;
>> +	struct unix_sk_info *s_ui;
>> +
>> +	list_for_each_entry(s_ui, &unix_sockets, list) {
> 
> This drives us into O(n^2) of unix peers resolution :(

I used pre-calculation optimizations in previous versions.
 
>> +		if (s_ui->ue->peer != r_ino)
>> +			continue;
>> +		/*
>> +		 * Currently, only DGRAM senders are dumped,
>> +		 * while others always have zero s_ino here.
>> +		 * For DGRAM, zero s_ino means "unnamed sender".
>> +		 */
>> +		if (s_ino && s_ino != s_ui->ue->ino)
>> +			continue;
>> +		/* Looking for unnamed sender, while s_ui is not */
>> +		if (r_ui->ue->type == SOCK_DGRAM &&
>> +		    !s_ino && count && s_ui->ue->name.len)
>> +			continue;
>> +		s_ui->peer = r_ui;
>> +		r_ui->queuer = s_ui->ue->ino;
>> +
>> +		/* socket connected to self %) */
>> +		if (s_ui == r_ui)
>> +			continue;
>> +
>> +		if (s_ui->queuer == r_ino)
>> +			interconnected_pair(s_ui, r_ui);
>> +		return 0;
>> +	}
>> +	return -1;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int add_receiver(u32 s_ino, struct unix_sk_info *r_ui)
>> +{
>> +	struct fdinfo_list_entry *s_fle, *r_fle;
>> +	struct pstree_item *r_task;
>> +	struct unix_sk_info *s_ui;
>> +	int fd;
>> +
>> +	if (!s_ino)
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	s_ui = find_unix_sk_by_ino(s_ino);
>> +	if (!s_ui) {
>> +		pr_err("Can't find a sender: ino=%d\n", s_ino);
>> +		return -1;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	r_fle = file_master(&r_ui->d);
>> +	r_task = pstree_item_by_virt(r_fle->pid);
>> +	if (!r_task) {
>> +		pr_err("Can't find task by vpid %u\n", r_fle->pid);
>> +		return -1;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	list_for_each_entry(s_fle, &s_ui->d.fd_info_head, desc_list) {
>> +		/* Return, if receiver task already owns this socket */
>> +		if (s_fle->pid == r_task->pid.virt)
>> +			return 0;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	fd = find_unused_fd(&rsti(r_task)->used, -1);
>> +	s_fle = file_master(&s_ui->d);
>> +
>> +	s_fle = dup_fle(r_task, s_fle, fd, s_fle->fe->flags);
>> +	if (!s_fle) {
>> +		pr_err("Can't dup sock fle\n");
>> +		return -1;
>> +	}
>> +	s_fle->flags |= FD_LE_GHOST;
>> +
>> +	pr_info("Add receiver %u to %u\n", r_ui->ue->ino, s_ino);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Resolves senders and returns number of foreign senders, we should receive.
>> + */
>> +static int resolve_senders(struct unix_sk_info *r_ui)
>> +{
>> +	struct sk_packet *pkt;
>> +	u32 s_ino, *sa = NULL;
>> +	int i, ret, count = 0;
>> +
>> +	list_for_each_entry(pkt, &packets_list, list) {
>> +		SkPacketEntry *entry = pkt->entry;
>> +		bool found = false;
>> +
>> +		if (entry->id_for != r_ui->ue->id)
>> +			continue;
>> +		if (entry->has_sender_ino)
>> +			s_ino = entry->sender_ino;
>> +		else
>> +			s_ino = 0;
>> +
>> +		for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
>> +			if (sa[i] == s_ino) {
>> +				found = true;
>> +				break;
>> +			}
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		if (found)
>> +			continue;
>> +
>> +		count++;
>> +		sa = xrealloc(sa, sizeof(u32) * count);
>> +		if (!sa)
>> +			goto err;
>> +		sa[count-1] = s_ino;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (count <= 1) {
>> +		s_ino = count ? sa[0] : 0;
>> +		ret = set_queuer(s_ino, r_ui, count);
>> +		if (ret == 0 || !count || r_ui->ue->type != SOCK_DGRAM)
>> +			goto out;
> 
> On ret == -1 you _may_ go ahead and try the for() loop below? Why? It's an error already.

It's not an error. Result ret == -1 is returned when a queuer is not found. You may have no
a queuer, when the sender of your only packet is not connected to you. Say, it sent
the packet using sendto().
 
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	BUG_ON(r_ui->ue->type != SOCK_DGRAM || !count);
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
>> +		ret = add_receiver(sa[i], r_ui);
>> +		if (ret < 0)
>> +			goto err;
>> +	}
>> +out:
>> +	xfree(sa);
>> +	return 0;
>> +err:
>> +	pr_err("Resolving senders failed\n");
>> +	return -1;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static int resolve_unix_peers(void *unused)
>>  {
>>  	struct unix_sk_info *ui, *peer;
>>  
>>  	list_for_each_entry(ui, &unix_sockets, list) {
>> +		if (resolve_senders(ui) < 0)
>> +			return -1;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	list_for_each_entry(ui, &unix_sockets, list) {
> 
> Why 2nd loop?

Have you read paragraph #2 in commentary to the patch?

> 
>>  		if (ui->peer)
>>  			continue;
>>  		if (!ui->ue->peer)
>> @@ -1411,18 +1553,6 @@ static int resolve_unix_peers(void *unused)
>>  		}
>>  
>>  		ui->peer = peer;
>> -		if (!peer->queuer)
>> -			peer->queuer = ui->ue->ino;
>> -		if (ui == peer)
>> -			/* socket connected to self %) */
>> -			continue;
>> -		if (peer->ue->peer != ui->ue->ino)
>> -			continue;
>> -
>> -		peer->peer = ui;
>> -
>> -		/* socketpair or interconnected sockets */
>> -		interconnected_pair(ui, peer);
> 
> Plain socketpais() are not not interconnected_pair()-ed,  aren't they?

Why not? They are pears of each other, so they are interconnected pair.

> 
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	pr_info("Unix sockets:\n");
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CRIU mailing list
>> CRIU at openvz.org
>> https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/criu
>> .
>>
> 


More information about the CRIU mailing list